<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Things Look Great in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thingslookgreatin2008.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thingslookgreatin2008.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:27:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Previous versions of CS was not that successful as CS 1.6 by CS 1.6</title>
		<link>http://www.thingslookgreatin2008.com/previous-versions-of-cs-was-not-that-successful-as-cs-1-6/297#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>CS 1.6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thingslookgreatin2008.com/?p=297#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Previous versions where successful but there where fragmentation in the market so no one knew what version to choose and there was lot of marketing involved in CS 1.6 so it got rolling very fast and gained huge popularity</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Previous versions where successful but there where fragmentation in the market so no one knew what version to choose and there was lot of marketing involved in CS 1.6 so it got rolling very fast and gained huge popularity</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Served from: www.thingslookgreatin2008.com @ 2012-02-23 01:31:40 -->
